Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ] 



 
Author Message
 Post subject: if x is a positive integer, is x^3 - 3x^2 + 2x...
 Post Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:48 pm 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 5
if x is a positive integer, is x^3 - 3x^2 + 2x divisible by 4?
1. x = 4y + 4, where y is an integer

2. x = 2z + 2, where z is an integer

guide 1 p 98

1. makes sense and is sufficient because if 'y' was 0 then x would still be 4 which would make the integers 4,3,2 which is divisible by 4, guaranteed.

2. i am confused because if z is an integer of -0- then 'x' would be = 2...so the integers are 2, 1, 0 which is not divisible by 4. So the answer is no.

yes answers would be any other number. If 'z' was 1 then 'x' would be 4, 3, 2 which is divisible by 4.

Please explain. Thanks!



guide 1 p 98


Top 
 Post subject: Re: if x is a positive integer, is x^3 - 3x^2 + 2x...
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 3:38 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 65
z=0 still works because 0 is divisible by 4. To quote our definition of divisibility (page 13): "An integer is said to be divisible by another number if the integer can be divided by that number with an integer result (meaning that there is no remainder."

0/4= 0 with no remainder. Therefore 0 is divisible by 4. This general rule comes up frequently in odd/even problems. Zero is even because it is divisible by 2.

_________________
Dmitry Farber
Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: if x is a positive integer, is x^3 - 3x^2 + 2x...
 Post Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:31 pm 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 5
thanks for your response. Before I went into the response I redid the question to familiarize myself. As I was working the problem for question 2.) 0I noted that when 'z' is -0- x ='s 2, 1, 0 and in the stem it states 'x' is a positive number which -0- does not abide by. I am assuming this is another way to conclude that 'd' is the proper answer.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: if x is a positive integer, is x^3 - 3x^2 + 2x...
 Post Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:40 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 65
No, that doesn't work because z=0 yields x=2. It's the initial xpression (rephrased as (x(x-1)(x-2)) that would equal 0, and there's no rule against that.

0 is a valid value for z, and it doesn't change the answer one way or another.

_________________
Dmitry Farber
Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ] 





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: