| Author |
Message |
|
stevenstratmann
|
Post subject: if x is a positive integer, is x^3 - 3x^2 + 2x... Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:48 pm |
|
 |
| Course Students |
|
|
Posts: 5
|
|
if x is a positive integer, is x^3 - 3x^2 + 2x divisible by 4? 1. x = 4y + 4, where y is an integer
2. x = 2z + 2, where z is an integer
guide 1 p 98
1. makes sense and is sufficient because if 'y' was 0 then x would still be 4 which would make the integers 4,3,2 which is divisible by 4, guaranteed.
2. i am confused because if z is an integer of -0- then 'x' would be = 2...so the integers are 2, 1, 0 which is not divisible by 4. So the answer is no.
yes answers would be any other number. If 'z' was 1 then 'x' would be 4, 3, 2 which is divisible by 4.
Please explain. Thanks!
guide 1 p 98
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
dmitryknowsbest
|
Post subject: Re: if x is a positive integer, is x^3 - 3x^2 + 2x... Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 3:38 pm |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 65
|
|
z=0 still works because 0 is divisible by 4. To quote our definition of divisibility (page 13): "An integer is said to be divisible by another number if the integer can be divided by that number with an integer result (meaning that there is no remainder."
0/4= 0 with no remainder. Therefore 0 is divisible by 4. This general rule comes up frequently in odd/even problems. Zero is even because it is divisible by 2.
_________________ Dmitry Farber Manhattan GMAT Instructor
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
stevenstratmann
|
Post subject: Re: if x is a positive integer, is x^3 - 3x^2 + 2x... Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:31 pm |
|
 |
| Course Students |
|
|
Posts: 5
|
|
thanks for your response. Before I went into the response I redid the question to familiarize myself. As I was working the problem for question 2.) 0I noted that when 'z' is -0- x ='s 2, 1, 0 and in the stem it states 'x' is a positive number which -0- does not abide by. I am assuming this is another way to conclude that 'd' is the proper answer.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
dmitryknowsbest
|
Post subject: Re: if x is a positive integer, is x^3 - 3x^2 + 2x... Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:40 am |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 65
|
|
No, that doesn't work because z=0 yields x=2. It's the initial xpression (rephrased as (x(x-1)(x-2)) that would equal 0, and there's no rule against that.
0 is a valid value for z, and it doesn't change the answer one way or another.
_________________ Dmitry Farber Manhattan GMAT Instructor
|
|
 |
|
 |
|