Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 2 of 2 [ 24 posts ] Go to page Previous  1, 2



 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: if x does not equal -y
 Post Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 5:15 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 8057
vinnu.m558 wrote:
Hi,

Even after going through all comments on this particular question I still feel that B is the right choice.

The actual ques after rephrasing is :
IS x-y>x+y ??


no, you can't do this -- you can't multiply by a denominator whose sign you are unsure of.
i.e., to get to this “rephrase” you have to multiply by (x + y); that is a problem, because we don't know whether (x + y) is positive or negative.
if (x + y) is positive then you get to rephrase shown here, but, if it is negative, then it becomes "<".

PLEASE READ THE THREAD BEFORE YOU POST -- all of this has already been explained earlier on this same page:
post10355.html#p10355

_________________
Being well-dressed gives a feeling of inward tranquillity [that] religion is powerless to bestow.
C.F. Forbes


Top 
 Post subject: Re: if x does not equal -y
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 7:35 am 
Offline
Forum Guests


Posts: 3
If x is not equal to -y, is (x-y)/(x+y) > 1?

(1) x > 0
(2) y < 0

I performed a few steps to simplify the left side of the inequality
and obtain a certain sign for the denominator.

As one number, x+y multiplied or divided by itself is positive. So, I performed the following operation to only
the left side,

[(x-y)/(x+y)]*[(x+y)/(x+y)] =

(x^2-y^2)/(x^2+2xy+y^2)

The denominator is positive, because it has can be written as n^2. Multiply both sides of the inequality by it

(x-y)/(x+y) > 1.............?
(x^2-y^2)/(x^2+2xy+y^2) > 1
x^2-y^2 > x^2+2xy+y^2

and combine like variables.

0 > 2y^2+2xy.

With a bit more simplification, rephrase the original expression as

0 > y^2 + xy

Is y(y+x) < 0 ?

Viewed as a positive-negative product.
The answer is yes in two situations.
Note that each situation has four conditions.

y > 0, y+x < 0, x < 0 AND x < -y

y < 0, y+x > 0, x > 0 AND x > -y

(1) x > 0. Statement (1) does not allow one
to reach the further conclusions that y < 0 and x > -y.
(2) y < 0. Statement (2) provides no information
on the value of x or the signs of x and y.

We do not have further information that x > -y, as is necessary to conclude that (x-y)/(x+y) > 1.


Last edited by wxandr on Mon Feb 13, 2012 10:43 am, edited 8 times in total.

Top 
 Post subject: Re: if x does not equal -y
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 3:57 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 4406
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
wxandr wrote:
Is 0 > y(y+x) ?

Now the inequality can be viewed as a positive-negative product.
If y > 0, y+x < 0, x < 0 and x < -y
If y < 0, y+x > 0, x > 0 and x > -y

(1) x > 0. This implies that y < 0, but it does not conclude that x > -y (x's positive pull is greater than y's negative pull).
(2) y < 0. This information is equivalent to (1).

We cannot conclude that x > -y, as is necessary to resolve whether (x-y)/(x+y) > 1.


your steps to manipulate this inequality are okay (i.e. the first line quoted above). the problem is everything after that. regardless of whether y is positive or negative (BTW notice that you haven't accounted for y being 0), we know nothing about x other than that it is not -y. you seem to be taking the question to be a true statement and comparing it against the statements, or reading too much into the relationship between x and y. either way, this analysis is incorrect..

_________________
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: if x does not equal -y
 Post Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 2:16 pm 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 52
I did this problem with flow chart approach learned from advanced quant strategy book.

Basically, if I can rephrase the question starting with a condition:
that x+y is positive, then I can cross-multiply directly.

This condition thus leads to two possiblities, one in which:
x-y > x + y
so it becomes o>2y, thus y is negative

And one in which
x-y < x+y (pretending that the scenario is opposite and x+y is negative, then I had just flipped the sign by cross-multiplying, hence I'm compensating it by flipping the sign later.
then in this case, 0<2y, so y is positive

Therefore, we arrived at two different conclusions, based on whether x+y is positve or negative. And we need a statement that tells us that x+y is positve or negative to target one specific result. Yet, as you can see, given that x is positve and y is negative from combining both statements, there are still different possibilities. x+y can be either positive or negative. THUS E


Similar problems can be found in OG 11th:
question 143 and 145, both can be solved easily without picking numbers if you know the flow chart approach.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: if x does not equal -y
 Post Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:11 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 2391
rachel, you are doing great work here! Keep it up!

_________________
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: if x does not equal -y
 Post Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 12:30 pm 
Offline
Students


Posts: 203
rachelhong2012 wrote:
I did this problem with flow chart approach learned from advanced quant strategy book.

Basically, if I can rephrase the question starting with a condition:
that x+y is positive, then I can cross-multiply directly.

This condition thus leads to two possiblities, one in which:
x-y > x + y
so it becomes o>2y, thus y is negative

And one in which
x-y < x+y (pretending that the scenario is opposite and x+y is negative, then I had just flipped the sign by cross-multiplying, hence I'm compensating it by flipping the sign later.
then in this case, 0<2y, so y is positive

Therefore, we arrived at two different conclusions, based on whether x+y is positve or negative. And we need a statement that tells us that x+y is positve or negative to target one specific result. Yet, as you can see, given that x is positve and y is negative from combining both statements, there are still different possibilities. x+y can be either positive or negative. THUS E


Similar problems can be found in OG 11th:
question 143 and 145, both can be solved easily without picking numbers if you know the flow chart approach.


Hi Rachel / Jamie - yeah this is approach is very good... Can you please confirm in my understanding is correct or am i missing any points here?

(x-y)/(x+y) > 1?

As Rachel has manipulated above we can set up 2 scenarios

1. (x+y) > 0
then x-y > x + y
so it becomes o>2y, thus y is negative

2. (x+y) < 0
then x-y < x + y
so it becomes o<2y, thus y is positive

how do i know which one to prove? i.e if Im able to prove any 1 scenario then would i be able to confirm (x-y)/(x+y) > 1?

Let says Option A and B were x<0 and y < 0 - in this case

x+y is definitely less than 0 so if x+y<0 then I should get y = +ve which is not the case here hence we get a definite NO so is the ANS C?

Let says Option A and B were x>0 and y > 0 - in this case


x+y>o and the result to prove is y = negative which is not the case so we again a definite NO so the ANS is C


Let says Option A and B were x>0 and y < 0 - in this case


x+y can be +ve or -ve so we don't know which one to prove y=-ve or +ve hence the ans is E.

Just wanted to be really sure of this method. My sincere thanks to both.

Cheers


Top 
 Post subject: Re: if x does not equal -y
 Post Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:42 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 4406
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
i'm actually going to recommend that you go back to the drawing board on this one. your approach is flawed from the beginning. it appears you are effectively trying to use the question to prove the statements, or some other approach that does not use the statements to evaluate the question. be careful about this sort of thing, as this is one of the easiest traps to fall into..

_________________
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: if x does not equal -y
 Post Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 1:23 am 
Offline
Students


Posts: 203
tim wrote:
i'm actually going to recommend that you go back to the drawing board on this one. your approach is flawed from the beginning. it appears you are effectively trying to use the question to prove the statements, or some other approach that does not use the statements to evaluate the question. be careful about this sort of thing, as this is one of the easiest traps to fall into..


Hi Tim - thanks for your response.

the sol below for this questions is parallel to the sol given for Q13 - Advanced guide Pg132

Question - If x does not equal -y, is (x-y)/(x+y) > 1?

1. x>0
2. y<0

Constrain = x + y not equal to zero

Question rephrase

Since we dont know whether x+y is +ve or -ve so we need to consider 2 scenario

1/ x+y > 0
x-y > x + y => 0>y

2/ x+y < 0
x-y < x+y => 0<y

So now if the statements tell us whether x+y > 0 then the question Is (x-y)/(x+y) > 1 becomes Is y negative

or if the statements tell us whether x+y < 0 then the question Is (x-y)/(x+y) > 1 becomes Is y Positive

Conversely if x+y > 0 and y is negative we can say (x-y)/(x+y) > 1
if x+y < 0 and y is +ve we can say (x-y)/(x+y) > 1

Are the above statements right?

Statement 1 - x>0 we do not know whether x+y is +ve or -ve so we dont know to which one to answer y = +ve or -ve

Statement 2 - y<0 we do not know whether x+y is +ve or -ve so we dont know to which one to answer y = +ve or -ve

Combined - we still cant say whether x+y is +ve or -ve

Therefore E

Does this makes sense?

--------------------- Few doubts related to the same problem --------

If the statements were
1. x>0
2. y>0


Combined we know x+y > 0 so the question now Is (x-y)/(x+y) > 1 can be rephrased to Is y negative

But according to statement 2 y is +ve so the answer is Definite NO hence answer would be C

If the statements were
1. x<0
2. y<0


Adding 2 statements we know x+y < 0 so the question becomes is Y positive
From B we know y is negative hence this is a def no

So the answer is C correct?

Cheers


Top 
 Post subject: Re: if x does not equal -y
 Post Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 4:21 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 8057
jp.jprasanna, yes, all of that works.

_________________
Being well-dressed gives a feeling of inward tranquillity [that] religion is powerless to bestow.
C.F. Forbes


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 2 of 2 [ 24 posts ] Go to page Previous  1, 2





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: jyothi h and 0 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron