Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 2 of 2 [ 22 posts ] Go to page Previous  1, 2



 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: If n is a positive integer and the product of all integers..
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 9:38 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 2597
metman82 wrote:
990 = 9 * 110 = 9 * 2 * 55 = 9 * 2 * 5 * 11
No other primefactors.


Yes, to be clear the prime factorization is 3 * 3 * 2 * 5 * 11.

_________________
Jamie Nelson
ManhattanGMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re: If n is a positive integer and the product of all integers..
 Post Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:49 pm 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 4
Sorry I understand how to get the prime factors of 990, but I am just confused of what the question is actually asking.
Is it asking for the largest prime factor or if there was another prime factor of 990 in the answer choices could that also be the answer? Just trying to figure out what the question asking?

Thanks and Regards

_________________
JJ32


Top 
 Post subject: Re: If n is a positive integer and the product of all integers..
 Post Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:14 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 12474
JJ32 wrote:
Sorry I understand how to get the prime factors of 990, but I am just confused of what the question is actually asking.
Is it asking for the largest prime factor or if there was another prime factor of 990 in the answer choices could that also be the answer? Just trying to figure out what the question asking?

Thanks and Regards


the question is asking for the smallest n such that 990 is contained in the product 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x ... x n.
if n were a smaller factor of 990 then it wouldn't work, because in that case the product 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x ... x n wouldn't be divisible by 11, and so, a fortiori, it wouldn't be divisible by 990.

_________________
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete fare domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent


Top 
 Post subject: Re: If n is a positive integer and the product of all integers..
 Post Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 1:23 pm 
Offline
Course Students


Posts: 4
RonPurewal wrote:
JJ32 wrote:
Sorry I understand how to get the prime factors of 990, but I am just confused of what the question is actually asking.
Is it asking for the largest prime factor or if there was another prime factor of 990 in the answer choices could that also be the answer? Just trying to figure out what the question asking?

Thanks and Regards


the question is asking for the smallest n such that 990 is contained in the product 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x ... x n.
if n were a smaller factor of 990 then it wouldn't work, because in that case the product 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x ... x n wouldn't be divisible by 11, and so, a fortiori, it wouldn't be divisible by 990.



Thanks Ron. It took a while for me, but now I understand.

_________________
JJ32


Top 
 Post subject: Re: If n is a positive integer and the product of all integers..
 Post Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2012 3:46 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 12474
good!

_________________
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete fare domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent


Top 
 Post subject: Re: If n is a positive integer and the product of all integers..
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 8:04 am 
Offline
Forum Guests


Posts: 24
jnelson0612 wrote:
madhan, that's certainly one way to look at it. Thanks!


I fail to understand the LCM approach. LCM (Least Common Multiple) is for atleast (minimum) 2 numbers. We have only one number here: 990.

How can we conclude the answer to the question is 11 by this approach ?


Top 
 Post subject: Re: If n is a positive integer and the product of all integers..
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 8:58 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 4847
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
the poster who mentioned LCM used the term incorrectly. you haven't missed anything.. :)

_________________
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 2 of 2 [ 22 posts ] Go to page Previous  1, 2





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: