Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 1 of 2 [ 16 posts ] Go to page 1, 2  Next



 
Author Message
 Post subject: Historians have long debated whether the spectacular
 Post Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm 
Historians have long debated whether the spectacular rise and fall of Napoleon in the decades after the French Revolution was the necessary outcome of the political vacuum having been created by the toppled monarchy.

was the necessary outcome of the political vacuum having been created by the toppled monarchy
was the necessary outcome of the political vacuum created by toppling the monarchy
were the necessary outcomes of the political vacuum that the toppled monarchy created
was the necessary outcome of the political vacuum created from toppling the monarchy
were the necessary outcomes of the political vacuum created by the toppling of the monarchy






I have a doubt in using subjunctive mood. When we use it, singular noun imply plural verb. If I were rich....Is the reverse true? That is in Subjunctive mood, does plural noun implies singular verb?
In choice B, we see it is a debate (not certain outcome), we should use subjunctive mood. So I feel B is correct. Please clarify.
Thanks
.
.
.
.
OA is E


Top 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 4:35 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 386
Not quite sure what you mean in your question about the subjunctive mood. Would you rephrase it?

The was/were split in the sentence is about subject-verb agreement, not subjunctive mood. The subject here is "rise and fall" so we need a plural verb -- eliminate A, B, and D.


Top 
 Post subject: doubt regarding...
 Post Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 9:25 pm 
i have 2 doubts here:-

1)
how 'rise and fall" is taken as plural. We have "bread and Butter", "fish and curry" etc few words though joined by AND but are treated as singular.
That why i think 'rise and fall" should be treated as singular.
2)
what is Diff between Created By and Created From
Isn't in E, it should be "...created from..."


Top 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 11:12 pm 
(A) having been created does not make sense grammatically.
(B) vacuum created by toppling the monarchy. Toppling is used as a participle but it has no clear referent: who is doing the work of toppling.
(C) sounds pretty close. But saying “...vacuum that the toppled monarchy created” may imply that the [toppled] monarchy created the vacuum. In fact, it is not the monarchy, but the toppling of monarchy, that created the vacuum.
(D) A preposition after toppling might improve the sentence.
(E) I prefer it. Here, toppling is the catalyst in rise and fall.


Top 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 11:12 pm 
(A) having been created does not make sense grammatically.
(B) vacuum created by toppling the monarchy. Toppling is used as a participle but it has no clear referent: who is doing the work of toppling.
(C) sounds pretty close. But saying “...vacuum that the toppled monarchy created” may imply that the [toppled] monarchy created the vacuum. In fact, it is not the monarchy, but the toppling of monarchy, that created the vacuum.
(D) A preposition after toppling might improve the sentence.
(E) I prefer it. Here, toppling is the catalyst in rise and fall.


Top 
 Post subject: can some answer my queries above... ?
 Post Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 12:15 pm 
can some answer my queries above... ?

Stacey/Ron - Pls advise


Top 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 6:06 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 6077
Location: San Francisco
Were Napoleon's rise and Napolean's fall one outcome or two? Two - a rise is different than a fall, they took place at distinct times, etc.

Be careful with colloquial language. Yes, technically, we can say things like "bread and butter is my favorite meal" but if you say that, you're saying you eat them together, as one thing. If you literally were to eat bread and, once finished with the bread, you then had some butter for dessert, you'd have to make that sentence plural!

Oops, I forgot to address your second question:
The bread and butter sculpture was created by Amy means Amy created the sculpture.
If I wanted to use created from instead, I'd say the sculpture was created from bread and butter. (Not created from Amy, hopefully!) :)

_________________
Stacey Koprince
Instructor
Director of Online Community
ManhattanGMAT


Top 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 8:35 pm 
rfernandez wrote:
Not quite sure what you mean in your question about the subjunctive mood. Would you rephrase it?

The was/were split in the sentence is about subject-verb agreement, not subjunctive mood. The subject here is "rise and fall" so we need a plural verb -- eliminate A, B, and D.


Rey

I did some online reading and found my answer. My question was:
In subjunctive mood, we use a plural verb 'were' for singular pronoun 'I'. So I was aksing, do we use the singular verb 'was' for plural pronoun 'they'...If they was rich, they would buy a house..but one reading of the sentence and I know it is incorrect. It would be ..if they were rich as well.

Thanks

____
Gmat on 12th July :shock:


Top 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 8:38 pm 
rfernandez wrote:
Not quite sure what you mean in your question about the subjunctive mood. Would you rephrase it?

The was/were split in the sentence is about subject-verb agreement, not subjunctive mood. The subject here is "rise and fall" so we need a plural verb -- eliminate A, B, and D.


And I was thinking of subjunctive! Just overlooked the 'and'. Thanks Rey.

PS: I wish I could edit my posts....


Top 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 8:43 pm 
Dear Staff
And a follow up question...

Historians have long debated whether the spectacular rise of Napoleon in the decades after the French Revolution was/were the necessary outcome of the political vacuum having been created by the toppled monarchy.

Now, as this is singular, but a 'debate', is this subjunctive mood? Do we pick 'were' for subjunctive here?


Top 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:32 pm 
Hi

Down to C and E but I am not sure why E is better than C ?

Thanks,
DCE


Top 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 5:42 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 7146
DCE wrote:
Hi

Down to C and E but I am not sure why E is better than C ?

Thanks,
DCE


stylistic preference.
in formal writing, the NOUN1 VERBed by the NOUN2 is preferred to the NOUN1 that the NOUN2 VERBed. you should memorize this preference, as it is essentially invariant throughout the universe of formal english writing.

there are good reasons for it, most notably that it is easier to parse at first sight, but those reasons are irrelevant: the preference exists, and that's all that really matters.


Top 
 Post subject: Re:
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 1:28 am 
Offline
Forum Guests


Posts: 1
RonPurewal wrote:
DCE wrote:
Hi

Down to C and E but I am not sure why E is better than C ?

Thanks,
DCE


stylistic preference.
in formal writing, the NOUN1 VERBed by the NOUN2 is preferred to the NOUN1 that the NOUN2 VERBed. you should memorize this preference, as it is essentially invariant throughout the universe of formal english writing.

there are good reasons for it, most notably that it is easier to parse at first sight, but those reasons are irrelevant: the preference exists, and that's all that really matters.


Thanks for this explanation.
Can you direct me to a few questions that involve this rule either from the OG or from Manhattan? This will help me understand this concept better.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Historians have long debated whether the spectacular
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:43 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 2242
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
As Ron explained, this is not a rule; it is a preference. You’ll find though that making up your own examples (preferably simple ones) for these sorts of constructions is usually better to memorize and take into the GMAT with you than to try to remember an entire question from the OG..

_________________
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Top 
 Post subject: Re:
 Post Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 7:18 am 
Offline
Students


Posts: 44
StaceyKoprince wrote:
Were Napoleon's rise and Napolean's fall one outcome or two? Two - a rise is different than a fall, they took place at distinct times, etc.

Be careful with colloquial language. Yes, technically, we can say things like "bread and butter is my favorite meal" but if you say that, you're saying you eat them together, as one thing. If you literally were to eat bread and, once finished with the bread, you then had some butter for dessert, you'd have to make that sentence plural!

Oops, I forgot to address your second question:
The bread and butter sculpture was created by Amy means Amy created the sculpture.
If I wanted to use created from instead, I'd say the sculpture was created from bread and butter. (Not created from Amy, hopefully!) :)


Hello Stacey,

Great Explanation! :)

My question:

Option E:
Historians have long debated whether the spectacular rise and fall of Napoleon in the decades after the French Revolution were the necessary outcome of the political vacuum created by the toppling of the monarchy.

Napoleon's rise and Napoleon's fall are two different events. I agree. Then, should not 'the necessary outcome' be replaced by 'the necessary outcomes'? And should not 'the rise and fall' be replaced by 'the rise and the fall' to make the subject unambiguously plural?

I hope to get a reply soon.

Thanks a lot! :)


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 2 [ 16 posts ] Go to page 1, 2  Next





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: