1. Consumer confidence levels, which many economists consider an early indication of the economy’s direction, sagged as the stock market tumbled, but not dramatically enough for giving a clear picture of new spending patterns.

(A) tumbled, but not dramatically enough for giving

(B) tumbled, but not dramatically enough to give

(C) tumbled, and not so dramatically as to have given

(D) has tumbled, and not dramatically enough to give（B）

(E) has tumbled, but not so dramatically as to give



What is tested: Tense & Idiom

1) We do not require has stumbled. because we do not have a clear indication of different time lines.

2) Now between A,B & C, C is wrong as it does not include but which is required as it shows some contrast

3) between A &b, A is wrong... to give is idiomatically better than for giving.

Also was wondering if my line of reasoning was right. Still would like to get an input why "Has is not requried"

1. Consumer confidence levels, which many economists consider an early indication of the economy’s direction, sagged as the stock market tumbled, but not dramatically enough for giving a clear picture of new spending patterns.

(A) tumbled, but not dramatically enough for giving

(B) tumbled, but not dramatically enough to give

(C) tumbled, and not so dramatically as to have given

(D) has tumbled, and not dramatically enough to give（B-correct answer）

(E) has tumbled, but not so dramatically as to give



What is tested: Tense & Idiom

1) We do not require has stumbled. because we do not have a clear indication of different time lines.

2) Now between A,B & C, C is wrong as it does not include but which is required as it shows some contrast

3) between A &b, A is wrong... to give is idiomatically better than for giving.

Please cite the source (author) of the question. We cannot comment until questions are properly cited. If not cited within a few days, the thread will be deleted. Thanks, and sorry for the inconvenience.

_________________
Emily Sledge
Instructor
ManhattanGMAT