Reply to topic
GMAT prep Math - GCF-LCM
romeo
Guest


Reply with quote
The integers m and p are such that 2<m<p and m is not factor of p. If r is remainder when p is divided by m then is r >1?

1) The greatest common factor of m and p is 2.
2) The Least common multiple of m and p is 30.


Thanks in advance for detailled explanation.

:oops:
Re: GMAT prep Math - GCF-LCM
shaji
Guest


Reply with quote
Statement 1 implies that m & p are even integers; therfore the remainder when p/m , the remainder r always is an integer greater than 2. SUFFICIENT.

Statement 2 implies that r=1, SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is D

romeo wrote:
The integers m and p are such that 2<m<p and m is not factor of p. If r is remainder when p is divided by m then is r >1?

1) The greatest common factor of m and p is 2.
2) The Least common multiple of m and p is 30.


Thanks in advance for detailled explanation.

:oops:
Re: GMAT prep Math - GCF-LCM
S
Guest


Reply with quote
Let m=5, p=6 such that 2<m<p & their LCM is 30, then p/m = 6/5 = 1 R 1 . So R is not greater than 1.

Answe should be A.

comment ?

.

shaji wrote:
Statement 1 implies that m & p are even integers; therfore the remainder when p/m , the remainder r always is an integer greater than 2. SUFFICIENT.

Statement 2 implies that r=1, SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is D

romeo wrote:
The integers m and p are such that 2<m<p and m is not factor of p. If r is remainder when p is divided by m then is r >1?

1) The greatest common factor of m and p is 2.
2) The Least common multiple of m and p is 30.


Thanks in advance for detailled explanation.

:oops:
Re: GMAT prep Math - GCF-LCM
shaji
Guest


Reply with quote
A typo error in my earlier post.

Statement 1 implies that m & p are even integers; therfore the remainder when p/m , is always an integer >=2. SUFFICIENT. A definitive YES

Statement 2 implies that r=1, SUFFICIENT. A definitive NO

The correct answer is D



S wrote:
Let m=5, p=6 such that 2<m<p & their LCM is 30, then p/m = 6/5 = 1 R 1 . So R is not greater than 1.

Answe should be A.

comment ?

.

shaji wrote:
Statement 1 implies that m & p are even integers; therfore the remainder when p/m , the remainder r always is an integer greater than 2. SUFFICIENT.

Statement 2 implies that r=1, SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is D

romeo wrote:
The integers m and p are such that 2<m<p and m is not factor of p. If r is remainder when p is divided by m then is r >1?

1) The greatest common factor of m and p is 2.
2) The Least common multiple of m and p is 30.


Thanks in advance for detailled explanation.

:oops:
arjun666@msn.com
Guest


Reply with quote
I think Answer is A.
Only 1st statement is sufficient, since both are even integers other than 2 and m is not a factor of p.
2nd statement says LCM is 30. Consider 5 and 6, then r=1 (r=1). Consider 6 and 10, then r = 4 (>1). Consider 6 and 15, then r = 3 (>1). This is insufficient.
Therefore answer should be A
Regards
Arjun
shaji
Guest


Reply with quote
arjun666@msn.com wrote:
I think Answer is A.
Only 1st statement is sufficient, since both are even integers other than 2 and m is not a factor of p.
2nd statement says LCM is 30. Consider 5 and 6, then r=1 (r=1). Consider 6 and 10, then r = 4 (>1). Consider 6 and 15, then r = 3 (>1). This is insufficient.
Therefore answer should be A
Regards
Arjun



The correct answer indeed is A. Statement 2 is insufficient as elegantly explained by U.
romeo
Guest


Reply with quote
Thanks guys, great discussion.
Explain
rajkoneru
Guest


Reply with quote
Can you please explain how r =1 using statement 2.
Guest83
Guest


Reply with quote
Raj,

If you let M = 5, P = 6....you will see that P / M = 1 r1

Therefore, R = 1.
The integers m and p are such that 2<m<p
bss
Guest


Reply with quote
I doubt the answer of A.

By statement1 we have that m and p both are even numbers. So for example we have m=6 and p=10. This also satisfies the condition that both have only 2 as the common factor. Now the point here is:
If I divide 10 by 6 -- I get a remainder 4. Which is >1 which is fine, it satisfies the answer as being A.
HOwever if I divide 10 by 6 and then remove the common 2 value---- reduce the equation to 5 / 3, then I get remainder as 2. Which is still ok and remainder is >1

Now another example let us take m = 4 and p = 6. Here also m / p will give remainder as 2 which is >1.
But if I reduce the equation 6 / 4 to 3 / 2. Then I get a remainder as 1. which is NOT > 1

So the answer A is doubtful.

Can the tutors pl explain.
Re: The integers m and p are such that 2<m<p
shaji
Guest


Reply with quote
Good question!!!. Do NOT reduce fractions, if U do so , the remainders too get reduced!!!



bss wrote:
I doubt the answer of A.

By statement1 we have that m and p both are even numbers. So for example we have m=6 and p=10. This also satisfies the condition that both have only 2 as the common factor. Now the point here is:
If I divide 10 by 6 -- I get a remainder 4. Which is >1 which is fine, it satisfies the answer as being A.
HOwever if I divide 10 by 6 and then remove the common 2 value---- reduce the equation to 5 / 3, then I get remainder as 2. Which is still ok and remainder is >1

Now another example let us take m = 4 and p = 6. Here also m / p will give remainder as 2 which is >1.
But if I reduce the equation 6 / 4 to 3 / 2. Then I get a remainder as 1. which is NOT > 1

So the answer A is doubtful.

Can the tutors pl explain.
Stacey Koprince
MGMAT STAFF

Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 2427
Location: San Francisco
Reply with quote
Shaji is right in his last post - you can't reduce the fractions without changing the remainders. Remember that these numbers don't represent a fraction; you are asked to perform long division. Write it that way, not as a fraction.

Also, Shaji, for your original mistake, you could have spotted that something was wrong because your two statements contradicted each other. (For one, you calculated that the remainder was greater than 2 and for the other you calculated that the remainder equaled 1. Those two statements are contradictory. If you ever calculate results that make the two statements contradict, you have done something wrong.)
shaji
Guest


Reply with quote
skoprince wrote:
Shaji is right in his last post - you can't reduce the fractions without changing the remainders. Remember that these numbers don't represent a fraction; you are asked to perform long division. Write it that way, not as a fraction.

Also, Shaji, for your original mistake, you could have spotted that something was wrong because your two statements contradicted each other. (For one, you calculated that the remainder was greater than 2 and for the other you calculated that the remainder equaled 1. Those two statements are contradictory. If you ever calculate results that make the two statements contradict, you have done something wrong.)


Thanks Indeed!!!.
Stacey Koprince
MGMAT STAFF

Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 2427
Location: San Francisco
Reply with quote
You're welcome!
GMAT prep Math - GCF-LCM
All times are GMT - 5 Hours  
Page 1 of 1  

  
  
 Reply to topic