go ahead and try the choices in succession, substituting them into the given equation, and see if any of them gives an absurdity (reductio ad absurdum).
(a) gives a + 2 - 2a = 0, or 2 - a = 0. this is perfectly possible, if a = 2.
(b) gives a + 1 - a = 0, or 1 = 0. impossible.
at this point there's no need to try the later choices, as it's clear that this is the absurdity. nevertheless, if you insist on trying the other 3 choices, you'll find that each of them gives one perfectly valid solution for a.
moral of the story = takeaway: in problems that define strange symbols or functions, pretty much the entire challenge will consist in just following the directions. these problems are paper tigers: they're intimidating to look at, but, once you realize that all you have to do is plug into the expression and watch what happens, they usually aren't that bad.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
Learn concepts that are most likely to appear on the GMAT.
Study Hall: Thursdays with Ron
Every other Thursday, join Ron Purewal for an hour and a half study session. Submit your questions online beforehand and Ron will handpick ones to teach during the session.
Answer our weekly GMAT math problem for a chance to win! Each week one correct answer is chosen to win guides and more. The more people enter, the better the prize!
Do you have what it takes to become a Manhattan GMAT instructor? If you have a 99th percentile score and prior teaching experience, apply here to make $100 an hour.
Not quite ready to be an instructor yourself? If you refer a friend to us and we hire them, we'll give you $1000.