Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ] 



 
Author Message
 Post subject: EIV Chapter 1 q.4
 Post Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 2:26 am 
Q. 4 |6+x| = 2x+1
The question says solve for all unknows.

The explnations says solve this for two cases 1. which the expression is positive and one in which it is negative. Notice that the solution arrived in Case 2 is not valid since it violates the condition that x be less that -6.

I do not understand where is the condition stated or from where do i derive the condition that x be less than -6.

Can you please help me how did i get to this condition x be less than -6

regards
chandni


Top 
 Post subject:
 Post Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:50 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 386
Quote:
Q. 4 |6+x| = 2x+1


Here's another way to go about this problem. In general, we know that |a| = a if a is positive. Also, we know that |a| = -a if a is negative. (Another way to say the latter sentence is that |a| equals the opposite of a if a is negative.)

So, what this tells us is that we can essentially "drop" the absolute value bars in an absolute value equation if we account for two cases: 1) when the expression within the absolute value bars is positive and 2) when the expression within the absolute value bars is negative. Let's use this approach for this problem:

|6+x| = 2x+1

Case 1
We know that we can rewrite |6+x| as (6+x) as long as (6+x)>0. When is that true? Solve the inequality:
(6+x)>0
x>-6

So, assuming that x>-6, |6+x| = 2x+1 can be rewritten as 6+x = 2x+1.
6+x = 2x+1
5+x = 2x
5 = x

This is a valid solution because x=5 holds under the initial condition above that x>-6.

Case 2
We know that we can rewrite |6+x| as -(6+x) as long as (6+x)<0. When is that true? Solve the inequality:
-(6+x)>0
-6-x>0
-x>6
x<-6

So, assuming that x<-6, |6+x| = 2x+1 can be rewritten as -(6+x) = 2x+1.
-(6+x) = 2x+1
-6-x = 2x+1
-7-x = 2x
-7 = 3x
-7/3 = x

This is NOT a valid solution, however, because x=-7/3 violates the initial condition that x<-6.


Top 
 Post subject: Re:
 Post Posted: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:29 pm 
Offline


Posts: 2
rfernandez wrote:
Quote:

This is NOT a valid solution, however, because x=-7/3 violates the initial condition that x<-6.


I was stuck on this same problem, too. Glad to find the explanation here!


Top 
 Post subject: Re: EIV Chapter 1 q.4
 Post Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 2:15 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 480
Location: Durham, NC
: )


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ] 





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: