Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ] 



 
Author Message
 Post subject: Data sufficiency question
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:41 am 
Offline
Forum Guests


Posts: 5
In Manhattan Guide 1 - Number properties, page - 100, in testing numbers; the data sufficiency question is:

If n is an integer and n^3 is between 1 to 100, inclusive what is the value of n>
(1) n=2k+1, where k is an integer.
(2) n is a prime number

When I solved the question i found that (1) alone is sufficient to answer.
There are only four no.s i.e 1,2,3,4 whose power if raised to 3 gives result between 1 to 100. Further, only integer 3 is the result of the equation in (1) which satisfies the given problem. e.g if you put 1 as k you get n=3 , if you put 2 as k you get n=5 which is not a solution at all as 5^3 is 125. Further more, if k= -1, n=-1 and -1^3=-1 which is also not fitting into the required solution. We are only left with answer 3. Therefore, i see that (1) alone is sufficient. But that guide says that (1) & (2) together satisfy it.

Please explain where i am going wrong in solving this?


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Data sufficiency question
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 5:36 pm 
Offline
Students


Posts: 21
You forgot that the set of integers includes 0 also,
substitute k = 0 and you get n = 1 and hence statement (1) alone is insufficient.

mneeti wrote:
In Manhattan Guide 1 - Number properties, page - 100, in testing numbers; the data sufficiency question is:

If n is an integer and n^3 is between 1 to 100, inclusive what is the value of n>
(1) n=2k+1, where k is an integer.
(2) n is a prime number

When I solved the question i found that (1) alone is sufficient to answer.
There are only four no.s i.e 1,2,3,4 whose power if raised to 3 gives result between 1 to 100. Further, only integer 3 is the result of the equation in (1) which satisfies the given problem. e.g if you put 1 as k you get n=3 , if you put 2 as k you get n=5 which is not a solution at all as 5^3 is 125. Further more, if k= -1, n=-1 and -1^3=-1 which is also not fitting into the required solution. We are only left with answer 3. Therefore, i see that (1) alone is sufficient. But that guide says that (1) & (2) together satisfy it.

Please explain where i am going wrong in solving this?


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Data sufficiency question
 Post Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 2:52 am 
Offline
Forum Guests


Posts: 63
STUD is correct . Please note the wording in the qs, which says "inclusive".

Another thing to remember : 1 is neither prime nor composite .

Hence combining 1 & 2 ,we get the value 3 and hence the ans is C>.

Thanks,
VCG


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Data sufficiency question
 Post Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:13 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 7146
i have moved this thread to the correct folder. (please do not post MGMAT questions in the GMAT PREP folder in the future; if you do so again, we will delete the thread.)

i think you're making the mistake of assuming that k also must be greater than 0.
if so, that's not the case -- n is restricted to the values 1, 2, 3, and 4, but k isn't.

so, for statement 1, both n = 1 (which corresponds to k = 0) and n = 3 (which corresponds to k = 1) fulfill the statement. that's two different n's, so statement 1 is insufficient.


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ] 





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: