Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ] 



 
Author Message
 Post subject: CR Conclusion
 Post Posted: Thu Aug 06, 2009 3:01 am 
Offline
Students


Posts: 1
While going through the material, somewhere it was mentioned that conclusion must be arguable either way.

Can give an example and explain, how what does this works.

Thanks in advance.

Raghu


Top 
 Post subject: Re: CR Conclusion
 Post Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 12:06 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 823
Hi Raghu,

I'm not exactly sure what you mean that the conclusion should be arguable either way. Can you find where this is stated in the Strategy Guide?

The whole point of the argument is to provide evidence for a conclusion. In other words, the conclusion is the biggest claim! If it were a fact that could not be argued, then it would not require premises to justify it.

For example, the statement "Water exists in solid for as ice." would not be a conclusion, because it cannot be argued; it is simply a fact.

Therefore, the conclusion should be arguable either way (but is, hopefully, supported by the premises in the argument).

Hope that helps!

_________________
Ben Ku
Instructor
ManhattanGMAT


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ] 





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: