Manhattan GMAT Forums Forum Index

Reply to topic
Contrary to?
Hei
Guest


Reply with quote
What is the correct usage?
What can it follow? noun only?
Contrary to X, Y...
Does X and Y have to be comparable like "like/unlike"?
Thanks in advance.
Hei
Guest


Reply with quote
Similarly, how about "whereas"?
Whereas X..., Y...
Does X and Y have to be comparable too?
Thanks in advance.
Re: Contrary to?
Ron Purewal
MGMAT STAFF

Joined: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 2295

Reply with quote
Hei wrote:
What is the correct usage?
What can it follow? noun only?
Contrary to X, Y...
Does X and Y have to be comparable like "like/unlike"?
Thanks in advance.


the 'X' in your writeup must be a noun, or a phrase that stands in for a noun (as in 'contrary to what they had told me, ...')

parallelism is not required. one reputable dictionary (i can't remember which, off the top of my head) lists 'contrary to orders, the soldier left camp' as an example, in which 'soldier' and 'orders' are clearly not meant to be logically parallel.

in extremely formal english usage, 'contrary to' should probably be used only as an adjective. for instance:
the financial advisor's advice, contrary to all his previous recommendations, was that his clients should liquidate their holdings in company x.
in this sentence, 'contrary to...' is an adjective phrase that modifies 'advice'.
in extremely formal usage, some experts would be uncomfortable with the soldier example above, preferring to replace it with a genuine adverbial construction such as 'in defiance of orders, ...'
Ron Purewal
MGMAT STAFF

Joined: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 2295

Reply with quote
Hei wrote:
Similarly, how about "whereas"?
Whereas X..., Y...
Does X and Y have to be comparable too?
Thanks in advance.


'whereas' is a standard subordinating conjunction, and is used in exactly the same way as such conjunctions as 'although' or 'even though'.
parallelism is required, and X and Y must both be complete clauses.
Contrary to?
All times are GMT - 5 Hours  
Page 1 of 1  

  
  
 Reply to topic