![]() |
| Columnist: People should avoid using a certain artificial |
|
Ron Purewal
MGMAT STAFF
|
you need to boil the columnist's position down to its essence, which is basically this:
fat absorbs vitamins that are essential. therefore, body doesn't get vitamins. therefore, bad news. the second 'therefore' here is unassailable (it's definitely bad news if your body doesn't get vitamins), so the only thing that might sway the argument in one direction or the other is the first 'therefore'. if we could break the connection between absorption of vitamins and robbing the body of vitamins, then we could possibly destroy the argument. choice a breaks the connection, because it introduces the possibility that the body might get the vitamins anyway, despite the absorption of some of those vitamins by the fat. b is irrelevant, as it doesn't matter where the vitamins come from (only whether they're properly absorbed) c is irrelevant, as the possible dangers of low-fat diets don't affect the above line of reasoning (the dangers of the artificial fat) at all d is irrelevant: which foods can contain the artificial fat has nothing to do with whether it will rob the body of vitamins e is irrelevant: taste has no bearing on the discussion at hand hope that helps. |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Columnist: People should avoid using a certain artificial |
|
||
|
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.


