tim wrote:
Hi gs,
Actually, if you look carefully at the question and the correct answer you’ll see that even if you interpret “housing blocks” as land the analysis holds and the correct answer still works. This is what happens more often than not – if the GMAT uses an ambiguous or technical term, you can define it in context and still be fine..
Hi - I eliminated C because of the word "Condo" as the premise and the conclusion talks about houses in general and something that's true with Condo cant affect the argument for instance there could have been 10 condos and 1000 Million houses in City X. - Is my reasoning correct?
Can someone please explain what's wrong with B!?