Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 2 of 2 [ 17 posts ] Go to page Previous  1, 2



 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Citical Reasoning
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 2:45 am 
Offline
Prospective Students


Posts: 121
tim wrote:
Hi gs,
Actually, if you look carefully at the question and the correct answer you’ll see that even if you interpret “housing blocks” as land the analysis holds and the correct answer still works. This is what happens more often than not – if the GMAT uses an ambiguous or technical term, you can define it in context and still be fine..


Hi - I eliminated C because of the word "Condo" as the premise and the conclusion talks about houses in general and something that's true with Condo cant affect the argument for instance there could have been 10 condos and 1000 Million houses in City X. - Is my reasoning correct?

Can someone please explain what's wrong with B!?


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Citical Reasoning
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 2:58 pm 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 2206
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
your analysis of C sounds good. as for B, Stacey explained why it was wrong; was there something about her explanation you found unsatisfactory?

_________________
Tim Sanders
Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 2 of 2 [ 17 posts ] Go to page Previous  1, 2





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: