| Author |
Message |
|
foobarnull
|
Post subject: CAT4 RC: Which... can be inferred about U.S. employers? Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:05 am |
|
|
|
|
Q: Which of the following can be inferred about U.S. employers of Mexican immigrants?
(B) Some of these employers violate wage laws. // CORRECT. If some of these immigrant workers are accepting wages “well below the U.S. minimum wage,” their American employers must be violating wage laws (i.e. paying wages below what the U.S. minimum wage requires).
"...are often more than willing to work for wages well below both the U.S. minimum wage and the poverty line."
Willing does not imply that they are actually accepting wages below the minimum wage, does it?
Also, about option D:
(D) Without Mexican immigrants, some of these employers would be forced to close their businesses. // The passage does not suggest that, without labor from Mexico, these employers will be forced to close. This answer is both too predictive and outside the scope of the argument.
"For years, U.S. employers have counted on a steady flow of labor from Mexico willing to accept low-skilled, low paying jobs."
"Counted on" makes Option D sound much more viable than Choice B to me... could you please explain the test maker's rationale behind this?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
foobarnull
|
Post subject: Re: CAT4 RC: Which... can be inferred about U.S. employers? Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 6:02 pm |
|
|
|
|
i'd appreciate a reply from anyone... taking the test soon :shock:
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
esledge
|
Post subject: Please post full question text Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 6:29 pm |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 901 Location: St. Louis, MO
|
|
We apologize for the delay in answering your question. This is a busy time of year, and we are working through the backlog as quickly as we can!
For RC questions, please post the text of the passage. Three reasons: The instructors don't necessarily have access to the passages as we answer questions on the forum, seeing the passage will benefit other forum users, and the answer is really found in the passage. Thanks!
_________________ Emily Sledge
Instructor
ManhattanGMAT
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
foobarnull
|
Post subject: Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 2:25 am |
|
|
|
|
disappointing turnaround time, but no worries. done with the test; couldn't care less now.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
esledge
|
Post subject: Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 1:40 pm |
|
 |
| ManhattanGMAT Staff |
|
|
Posts: 901 Location: St. Louis, MO
|
|
OK.
For the record, too much of our time on the forum is spent enforcing the rules (to avoid copyright infringement) and asking for clarification, as above. My apologies go to the many forum users who follow protocol. Many thanks for your continued support.
_________________ Emily Sledge
Instructor
ManhattanGMAT
|
|
 |
|
 |
|