|
We can't discuss OG questions on this forum, but I couldn't find your example in there anyway. Maybe your source is cited incorrectly? Please confirm if so. In any case, there is an OG question (#20, 11th edition) that you may want to check out. It's not identical, but related.
Here's a general way to evaluate modifiers, especially those set off by commas at the beginning of a sentence. Phrase it as a question, like on Jeopardy. The answer to the question must follow the comma. So for your examples:
1. "Based on the analysis presented in the report" becomes "WHAT was based on the analysis?" Answer: a decision. Because "the company" comes after the comma, this is a misplaced modifier.
2. "Because of the analysis presented in the report" becomes "WHAT was because of the analysis?" Answer: a decision, or maybe the specifics of the decision. Again, this is wrong because the phrase modifies "the company" instead. Additionally, I think it is more idiomatic to say a decision is "based on" something rather than "because of" something. "Because of" implies that the decision was prompted by the analysis, whereas "based on" means the decision was influenced by the analysis.
3. "Using the analysis presented in the report" becomes "WHO/WHAT used the analysis?" Answer: employees/managers of the company. This example is borderline, in my opinion, as a company doesn't technically use analysis, the people who work at the company do.
4. "Based on the analysis presented in the report" becomes "WHAT was based on the analysis?" Answer: a decision, which is exactly what we find after the comma. This modifier is correct.
_________________ Emily Sledge
Instructor
ManhattanGMAT
|