![]() |
| Asset allocators create - Problem with past participle |
|
Sputnik
Guest
|
X , modifier of X ,past participle .....
in this case... do we just remove the modifier ?? or can we also read it as X,modifier of X , modifier of [modifier of X] I hope you understand what I am trying to say.... :) Thanks Sputnik |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Sorry -- mistake |
|
Sputnik
Guest
|
Sorry guys...
Posted it here by mistake... Please delete/shift this thread. |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Pathik
Guest
|
I am curious to hear from tutors, though my understanding is that "modifier of x"(often in the form of mutual funds) is comma seperated non-essential clause and that non-essential clause could be removed without loss of clarity to the sentence. So, "intended to...." *must* modify portfolio and not mutual funds.
Pathik |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
sanj
Guest
|
I agree with pathik
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Stacey Koprince
MGMAT STAFF
|
Hi, I'm sorry we missed this post. Did you ask the question again already in the general verbal thread, or should I move this over there so it can be answered?
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Asset allocators create - Problem with past participle |
|
||
|
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.
Content © Manhattan GMAT Forums
*GMAT and GMAT CAT are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council,
which neither sponsors nor endorses this test preparation service.


