thanghnvn wrote:
Ron, pls, help.
D is concise and clear and not ambiguous and we do not need paralelism here. So, D is correct.
(d) is inferior to (e).
look at the structures:
(d):
women who ate... vs.
women eating...(e):
women who ate... vs.
those who ate...(e) is clearly better.
i don't think i understand what you mean by “we don't need parallelism here”. when you have parallel contexts, parallel structures are ALWAYS preferred to non-parallel structures -- that's the whole point.
in (d), the structures are not parallel; therefore (d) is wrong. in (e), on the other hand, the structures are parallel.
Quote:
why we need paralelism. It is clear already. Or, even if the sentence is clear, we still prefer parallelism.
again, i'm not sure i understand what you're asking.
if the question you're asking is “do we always prefer parallelism to non-parallelism?” then the answer is, clearly, yes.