If p is a prime number greater than 2, what is the value of p ?

(1) There are a total of 100 prime numbers between 1 and p+1

(2) There are a total of p prime numbers between 1 and 3912

Thanks.

wow, this question really showed up on the gmatprep? if so, it's unprecedented: it's honestly the first question i've ever seen on which it's simply impossible to compute the actual answer choice within the time limit without an absurdly prodigious amount of memorized knowledge (here, knowledge about prime numbers).

there are many, many official problems on which you don't have to solve for a quantity - and in which solving for the quantity would certainly waste time - but, in all those problems, you can solve for the quantity well within the 2-minute guideline if you know what you're doing.

--

in any case:

(2) must be sufficient, as there is obviously some fixed number of primes between 1 and 3912. we don't care what that number is, because it's clear that there's only one such number (the number of primes in a fixed range isn't about to change anytime soon).

(1) also sufficient: p is a prime number, so:
if p is the 100th prime, then there are 100 primes - viz., the first 100 primes - between 1 and p + 1.
if p is the 101th prime or later, then there are 101 or more primes, so that's no good.
if p is the 99th prime or earlier, then there are 99 or fewer primes; also no good.
therefore, p is the 100th prime.

answer = d

incidentally, the actual value of p is 541.

Agree that this is non-GMAT-like. iil-london, can you confirm that you saw this yourself on a GMATPrep test? (That is, you did not just copy this from some other online source that said it was gmatprep - or that this is something else entirely and you just accidentally posted it in the gmatprep folder.) Odd for an official math problem to rely entirely on logic.

how can i miss this..yes ron and stacey it is cent percent from gprep since i got the same question today...on my 1st gprep...was about to ask until the above post....was completely stumped and had to guess.....

Wow - color me surprised!

yeah, wow, that's insane.

we'll have to keep an eye out for similar problems; this could just be a freak occurrence, or it could signal a rising tide of changing priorities.

First ... thanks for your posts. Second, sorry for the delay in responding.
Yes ... ABSOLUTELY ... this was in the GMATPrep test.

But as Ron's response pointed out ... this was in a Data Sufficiency question ... so if you can ascetain that the information provided in the question stem and the statements is sufficient to solve the problem then that is all you need to do. You dont have to try and work out the exact number ... just that there is enough info in the statements and questions stem to do so.
This was the trap that I fell into when encountering this question for the first time !

Thanks!