gokul_nair1984 wrote:
RonPurewal wrote:
the above solutions aren't good enough, actually; in these kinds of problems, you can't just pick one value and watch what happens. in order to be convinced that the pattern is genuine, you would have to pick a succession of numbers that satisfies each of the statements, and make sure that you keep getting the same remainder every time.
I totally understand the point you are making here Ron. But the question does not necessarily specify which of the following options
must leave a remainder 6( In which case we need to check for multiple cases) ; rather the stem asks which of the following leaves a remainder 6( Even if 1 plug in satisfies the condition, the stem is satisfied.) In other words, the question is not a must be true type( for all cases).
What do you think?
yeah ok, i see what you're saying here -- the language of this problem does pretty much imply that the remainder will be the same every time.
i don't think that this is actually an official problem, since i don't think the official problems would be this cavalier with their language; i'm pretty sure that any official problem would contain either "must" or "could" in the problem statement.
technically, though, if you DO see a problem like this, you should treat it as a "must" problem.