Register    Login    Search    Rss Feeds

 Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ] 



 
Author Message
 Post subject: * SC: For many revisionist historians
 Post Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 1:16 am 
Offline
Students


Posts: 16
For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere.
A. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere
B. devastation and enslavement in the name of progress by which native peoples of the Western Hemisphere decimated
C. devastating and enslaving in the name of progress those native peoples of the Western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated
D. devastating and enslaving those native peoples of the western Hemisphere which in the name of progress are decimated
E. the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimated the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere

OA : A

I could not understand what "that" is referring to in the correct option A. According to the right answer it says "progress" has decimated native peoples but logically how is that possible. Please guide me if correct.
Also, then I though that the phrase "X in the name of Y" could mean that Y will give opposite result of X and could be true. Am I thinking in the right direction? please help

I marked E as the answer but considering "the" in "the devastation and enslavement", which makes it a compound noun, I found that I mistook the subject verb agreement, and after "that" only singular verb can come in this option.
Could you also explain if I am on the right track for E

The source of this question is a definitely not 1000SC document but a document of GMATprep questions I have.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC: For many revisionist historians
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 7:55 am 
Offline
Forum Guests


Posts: 7
that' without a comma - they must modify the immediately preceding noun. "progress"


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC: For many revisionist historians
 Post Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 9:26 am 
Offline
Students


Posts: 16
muralidharin wrote:
that' without a comma - they must modify the immediately preceding noun. "progress"


As per you, then it is the "progress" which decimated the native people. This does not make any sense.

Experts please help!


Top 
 Post subject: Re: SC: For many revisionist historians
 Post Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 9:39 am 
Offline
ManhattanGMAT Staff


Posts: 7146
hitesh, you can't use "a random document of GMATPrep problems" as a source. please read the forum rules -- we need ORIGINAL sources.

this thread will be deleted in a week or two.


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ] 





Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: