|
In the example given, the argument states that trains are safer than cars, and planes are safer than trains. The author is implying that safety is in this order:
planes > trains > cars
So the implication of the two statements is that planes are safer than cars. This is in support for the argument, because it is arguing that buses are like cars, so they are less safe than planes. Therefore, train > car is supporting the argument.
Sometimes if you don't really know where to classify a statement, just write it down. It might be more clear how it fits in after you've read through the entire argument.
_________________ Ben Ku Instructor ManhattanGMAT
|