Which CR question type drives you crazy? Boldface? Find the Assumption? Inference?
I’ve put together what I’m calling the Master Resource List for this question type. A couple of disclaimers. First, this list includes only free resources, no paid ones. There are a lot of good resources out there that cost some money—they’re just not on this list!
Second, this list is limited to my own articles. I’m not trying to claim that only my articles are good enough to make such a list—far from it. I’m most familiar with my own articles, so that’s what I’m using. (And, okay, I will admit that I think the ManhattanGMAT CR process is the best one out there. But I’m biased. : ) )
The CR Process
Before you dive into individual question types, it’s critical to know the overall CR process. A few key notes:
- There 4 major and 5 minor question sub-types* and each one has its own particular technique details.
- Your job is to learn the overall process / strategy for CR as well as the techniques specific to each question sub-type.
* Every now and then, a question pops up that doesn’t quite fit one of the 9 main categories. There are exceptions to every rule in the universe.
In order to master CR, you should be able to answer the following questions about each question type:
- How do I recognize this question type?
- What kind of information should I expect to find in the argument, based on this question type? What kind of information is going to be the most important?
- What is the goal for this question type? What characteristics must the correct answer have?
- What kinds of traps will be set for me? What are the common wrong answer types for this question type?








But students don’t get them all right. Even those who know what all the words mean. Why is that? Because people think. They assume, they rationalize, and they inject opinions. Why is this bad? Because it’s a game. Critical Reasoning doesn’t take place in reality. Here’s an analogy I thought up all by myself, so it isn’t in the Strategy Guide: Critical Reasoning bears the same relationship to reality that Monopoly does. When you play Monopoly, you don’t think about how reasonable free parking or building hotels is, you exploit the rules. It’s the same thing. A lot of OG arguments involve medical issues, but you hardly ever care whether people live or die because that’s usually not the conclusion. Play the game.
Recently, I published an article challenging those going for a 750+ to 
The great irony here, of course, is that the training you get as an MBA is exactly the training that sharpens your ability to think critically about arguments like this one. In fact, that’s what the GMAT actually tests with its Critical Reasoning section. Just to demonstrate, I’d like to break down this infographic from top to bottom, using the same strategy I teach my students: pointing out the (flawed) assumptions necessary to conclude that an MBA is overvalued.

This week, we’re going to discuss one of the most common critical reasoning problem types: Strengthen the Conclusion. Strengthen questions belong to the Assumption Family of questions; we’ll talk more about that later.