Archives For Data Sufficiency

The other week, we discussed the overall process for Data Sufficiency.GMAT books This week, we’re going to test out the process using a GMATPrep question – and take a look at a couple of very common DS traps.

Set your timer for 2 minutes…. and… GO!

* ” A bookstore that sells used books sells each of its paperback books for a certain price and each of its hardcover books for a certain price. If Joe, Maria, and Paul all bought books in this store, how much did Maria pay for 1 paperback book and 1 hardcover book?

“(1) Joe bought 2 paperback books and 3 hardcover books for $12.50.

“(2) Paul bought 4 paperback books and 6 hardcover books for $25.00.”

Note that I haven’t listed the answer choices for you. Because DS answers are always the same, we should memorize them. If you don’t have them memorized yet, look back at the “How DS Works” article linked in the first paragraph.

All right, let’s tackle this problem.

Step 1: Read the Question Stem

The first sentence tells us that each paperback book sells for the same price and each hardcover book also sells for the same price (but possibly a different price than the paperback books).

The question asks how much Maria paid for 1 of each type of book. Is this a value or a yes/no question?

They’re asking for a specific amount; this is a value question. We’ve also got lots of words; we’re going to have to translate.

Continue Reading…

Let’s just put it right out there: data sufficiency is bizarre. If you’re just starting out, you’re probably thinking, “What is this thing?” Even if you’ve been studying for a while, unless you really like math, you probably feel a little uncomfortable whenever a DS question pops up on the screen.

Why? Because we all realize that we could completely mess up a DS question… and still get to one of the 5 answer choices, clueless that we’ve messed up. “It’s not like Problem Solving, where at least I know when I mess up because my answer isn’t in the answer choices!” (Actually, a lot of the time, we still get an answer that’s in the answer choices even on PS… but we persist in feeling that PS is more straightforward because the answers are “real.”)

What is DS?

The GMAT really isn’t a math test. These tests are actually trying to test us on our “executive reasoning” skills – that is, how well we make decisions and prioritize when faced with too many things to do in too short a length of time.

Data Sufficiency questions test our ability to (quickly) analyze a collective set of data and figure out which pieces are needed to do the job. Imagine your boss dumping a bunch of stuff on you and saying, “Hey, our client wants to know whether they should raise the price on this product. Can you answer that question from this data? If so, which pieces do we need to prove the case?”

We do, of course, have to do some math – and sometimes that math is quite annoying. We usually don’t, however, have to do as much as is necessary on the more “normal” quant questions (PS).

Continue Reading…

gmat weight averageIn an earlier post, we tackled a medium-level GMATPrep® weighted average question; click here to read that article before reading this one. This week, we’re trying a harder GMATPrep®  weighted average question in order to test whether you learned the concept as well as you thought you did. : )

As we discussed earlier, every weighted average problem I’ve seen (so far!) on GMATPrep is a Data Sufficiency question. This doesn’t mean that they’ll never give us a Problem Solving weighted average problem, but it does seem to be the case that the test-writers are more concerned with whether we understand how weighted averages work than with whether we can actually do the calculations. Last week, we focused on understanding how weighted averages work via writing some equations. We’ll try to apply that understanding to our harder problem this week, along with a more efficient solution method.

Let’s start with a sample problem. Set your timer for 2 minutes…. and… GO!

* A contractor combined x tons of gravel mixture that contained 10 percent gravel G, by weight, with y tons of a mixture that contained 2 percent gravel G, by weight, to produce z tons of a mixture that was 5 percent gravel G, by weight. What is the value of x?

(1) y = 10

(2) z = 16

There are two kinds of gravel: “10% gravel” and “2% gravel.” These are our two “sub-groups.” When the two are combined (in some unknown – for now! – amounts), we get a 3rd kind:“5% gravel.” The number of tons of “10% gravel” (x) and the number of tons of “2% gravel” (y) will add up to the number of tons of “5% gravel” (z), or x + y = z. We need to find the number of tons of “10% gravel” used in the mixture.

The problem this week throws in a new wrinkle: we’re not just trying to calculate a ratio this time. We have to have enough info to calculate the actual amount of “10% gravel” used. Last week, we never had to worry about the actual number of employees. We’ll have to keep that in mind to see how things might change.

Continue Reading…

In honor of Gabby Douglas’ gold medal win, as well as the U.S. women’s gymnastics team’s all-around gold medal win, here is an Olympics-inspired Data Sufficiency problem.

gmat olympics

A particular gymnastics tournament awards a gold, a silver, and a bronze medal in each of four events: Floor, Beam, Bars, and Vault. A platinum “Best All-Around” medal is awarded to the competitor who gains the most points from winning the other medals: 3 points for gold, 2 points for silver, 1 point for bronze. If McKenzie won the Best All-Around medal, and no one can win more than one medal in any of the four events, did she win at least one gold medal?

  1. All of the gold, silver, and bronze medals were won by fewer than six competitors, including McKenzie
  2. Another competitor in the tournament has 8 points.

(A) Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.

(B) Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.

(C) BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.

(D) EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.

(E) Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

Choose your answer before proceeding!

First, you may ask, “How could someone win the All-Around without winning a single gold medal?”

Easy – just imagine that McKenzie won ALL of the silver medals (8 points), and that no one else won more than one medal (the other medals are won by 8 separate people), so each person who has a gold has just 3 points, and each person who has a bronze has just 1 point.

Continue Reading…

If the GMAT were a sport, it would definitely be baseball, and not just because it’s three and a half hours long. In baseball, you might dominate the minor league by hitting fastballs, but once you reach the show you’ll have to hit some change-ups and curveballs too. Not only is the GMAT going to throw you some hard problems, but once you start to do well, the GMAT will throw you something different. That’s why learning the types of trap answers can help you from falling for them. Here’s four types of curveballs that you want to be mindful of on test day.

Dreams Scene

If you test it, they will come.

Continue Reading…

Inequalities

Stacey Koprince —  February 7, 2012 — 15 Comments

Today we’ve got an inequalities data sufficiency question on tap from GMATPrep®. Set your timer for 2 minutes and go!

“Is m + z > 0?

“(1) m – 3z > 0
“(2) 4zm > 0”

This is a yes/no data sufficiency question. I’m just going to remind myself of the rules: an “always yes” answer to a statement is sufficient, an “always no” answer is also sufficient, and a “maybe” or “sometimes yes / sometimes no” answer is not sufficient.
Continue Reading…

Data sufficiency problems can be a lot of fun because we don’t actually have to solve all the way to the end of the problem. At the same time, data sufficiency problems can be maddening because of the way in which the information is worded. Often, especially on harder questions, the question stem or statements in a data sufficiency problem are worded in such a tricky way that we’re not sure of the significance of the information after we’ve read it.

This lesson is all about how to Rephrase the information in a more useful way. (For those who have taken or are planning to take our class, the Rephrasing lesson occurs during class 1, though I’ve changed the order in which the types are presented in this article.) Continue Reading…

This week, we have a follow-on article from Chris Ryan, Manhattan GMAT’s Director of Instructor and Product Development. Chris introduced the concept of “layering” to us in this article on Sentence Correction. Layering is a technique used by a test writer to make a question more difficult. Today, Chris is going to show us how layering works in data sufficiency questions.

Note: I’ve repeated the introduction from the first article below, in case some of you haven’t read that one. If you did read the first one, the first few paragraphs will be review for you.


We all know that the GMAT is a computer adaptive test, and computer adaptive tests give us questions based on the difficulty level that we “earn” as we take the test. How do the test writers at ACT (the organization that writes the GMAT) determine which questions are harder than others?

First, ACT engages in a process called “normalization,” wherein all freshly written questions are tested by actual test takers to determine what percentage answer the questions correctly (we know these questions as “experimental” questions). If too many people answer correctly, the question may need to be toughened up. If too few people answer correctly, the question may need to be dumbed down. ACT is looking to assemble a pool of questions that covers a range of difficulty, from cakewalk to mind-bending, and the test takers help them do so.

Continue Reading…