In the first part of this article, we talked about how GMAT quant problems are often written to imply a certain approach or solution path that is not actually the best way to do the problem. We want to reorient our view in order to pick an easier, more efficient setup or solution (if at all possible).

We finished off with a homework assignment; here’s the problem I gave you (from the free problems that come with the GMATPrep software):

* ” If , then =

“(A) -

^{1}/_{2}“(B) -

^{1}/_{3}“(C)

^{1}/_{3}“(D)

^{1}/_{2}“(E)

^{5}/_{2}”

The answers are fractions but they aren’t horrible fractions. They give me a value for *x* / *y*. The question is kind of annoying though, because the form doesn’t match *x* / *y*.

Or does it? Is there any way for me to rearrange that thing to make it look more like *x* / *y*?

Yes! Check it out:

Now, how did I know to do that? I’ve actually seen another problem with the same shortcut: split the numerator into two fractions. The first time I saw that *other* problem, though, the way I figured it out was that whole “Well, this is annoying, why did they give it to me that way!” And so I started looking at it differently and asking myself some questions:

“They gave me a value for *x* / *y*. But the question doesn’t give me *x* / *y*. Is there any way I can *make* *x* / *y*? There is an *x* on top and a *y *on the bottom; what if I put those two together?

“Oh, yeah, I see! It’s totally legal to split the numerator and get two separate fractions, so that would give me *x* / *y* for one of the fractions. Does that make my life any easier, though?

“The other fraction just turns into 1! That’s fantastic! I know what I’m doing now.”

Et voilà ! I know that , so . Plug that in and get 1 – 1.5 = -0.5.

Note that it’s easier to add and subtract in decimal (or percent) form, so if fractions can be converted easily (as 3/2 can), then consider doing the subtraction in decimal form. You already know that it will be easy to convert back into the final answer because look at the answer options—they’re all easy fractions to convert.

The correct answer is (A).

Quick! Glance at the answer choices for the above problem. If you did no work at all and had 1 second to make a guess, which answer would you NOT pick?

Are you sure about that?

You wouldn’t want to pick the last answer. (I’m deliberately not typing the letter so that your eye can’t pick it up when trying to answer my question two sentences ago!) Four of the answers come in obvious “pairs”; that is, they’re the same except for the sign (positive or negative). The chances are very good, then, that you need to be very careful about signs when doing the work and that the “odd answer out” will not be the correct answer. Why?

Because one of the traps this problem is setting is the sign; some number of people will drop the negative by accident, and wind up with (D) as the answer instead of (A). That trap doesn’t exist for answer (E) because it doesn’t have an “opposite sign” counterpart. So, if you have to guess, don’t pick it.

Ready to try another? Here you go (once again, this is from the free problem set that comes with GMATPrep):

* ” On the number line above, the segment from 0 to 1 has been divided into fifths, as indicated by the large tick marks, and also into sevenths, as indicated by the small tick marks. What is the least possible distance between any two of the tick marks?

“(A)

^{1}/70“(B)

^{1}/35“(C)

^{2}/35“(D)

^{1}/12“(E)

^{1}/7”

Fifths *and* sevenths? No, this problem isn’t annoying at all. (Yes, that’s my sarcasm voice.)

Remember our four process steps from the first half of this article? What was the first one again?

Glance! In this case, glance at those answer choices. They’re fractions. Why is that useful? Often, when something is presented in terms of fractions or percentages, you can either pick your own number (if no real numbers are given) or you can adjust the numbers given to easier numbers (as long as all relationships are kept intact).

In this case, we can’t pick any random numbers that we like because they do give some parameters. Those parameters, though, are incredibly annoying: 1/5, 2/5, 3/5, and 4/5 are not too bad, but then we have 1/7, 2/7, 3/7, and so on. Yuck!

Why couldn’t they have given me whole numbers instead of fractions?

Hey, wait a second… why can’t I turn these into whole numbers instead of fractions myself? The answers are also in fraction form, so I can!!

If you were going to do the “real” math, you’d have to find common denominators for 5 and 7. Instead, just make the whole number line 0 to 35!

Now, there are tick marks at the fifths (7, 14, 21, 28) and at the 7ths (5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30). Find the two, one from each set, that are closest together.

Maybe you pick 14 and 15, for a difference of 1. Or maybe you pick 20 and 21 for the same difference of 1.

The answer isn’t just “1” though—it’s 1 out of 35, or 1/35.

One more intricacy: the problem asks for the *least* possible distance. How can you be sure that 1/70 (the only smaller answer) is not a possible distance?

If you’re checking all the numbers in fraction form, then you really can’t be 100% sure till you check them all. Yuck. If you’re doing the problem in integer form, though, then you know you can’t get a smaller distance than 1, because they’re all integers. At the least, they have to be 1 apart. In addition, the denominator has to be 35, because that’s the new length of the line. So you know it can’t get any smaller than 1/35.

The correct answer is (B).

This last problem nicely illustrates the concept that we’ve been discussing: whoever wrote the question is implying a certain path and part of the test is whether you just start walking down it or whether you glance around first to choose the best path for you. In this case, they set us up with fractions, but we aren’t *required* to follow that path. We can turn this thing into integers instead. And who wouldn’t rather work with integers?

**Key Takeaways for Reorienting Your View**

(1) If a problem seems to imply a certain path, be skeptical. After all, the test writers aren’t in the business of helping you get a better score on the test! Take a step back and choose an approach based on your own knowledge and strengths.

(2) Don’t just dive in! Think about what you’ve got and where you’re trying to go before you pick a path to get there. Remember:

(1) Glance

(2) Read and Jot

(3) Reflect and Organize

(4) Work

(3) Get in the habit of explicitly asking yourself, “What’s annoying about the problem? Is there any way I can avoid that annoying bit, or deal with it in an easier way than the ‘textbook’ approach?” At first, you’ll be doing this after the problem is over, when you’re reviewing your work and trying to get better. If you get really good, though, then you may sometimes be able to redirect yourself while the clock is still ticking!

* GMATPrep® questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.

Thanks Stacey ,for the useful article.

will you please clarify my doubt regarding the last PS:-

As Q says”divided into fifths, as indicated by the large tick marks, and also into sevenths, as indicated by the small tick marks. ”

but u indicated 5 and its multiples to small tick marks and vice versa…..

doesn’t it make any difference?

it makes difference in calculating the length of line…

I would be thankful to you to clarify my doubt….

Oh, I see – the text does reverse that – but the vertical lengths of the lines don’t have anything to do with the problem. That’s just to distinguish visually between the two types. What matters is the horizontal distance between tick marks.

on no wait – sorry, I read it backwards. No, those markings do match exactly what the text says.

The higher tick marks do represent the 5ths: 1/5 = 7. 2/5 = 14. 3/5 = 21. 4/5 = 28.

And the smaller ones do represent the 7ths. What is 1/7 of 35?