In an earlier post, we tackled a medium-level GMATPrep weighted average question; click here to read that article before reading this one. This week, we’re trying a harder GMATPrep weighted average question in order to test whether you learned the concept as well as you thought you did. : )

As we discussed earlier, every weighted average problem I’ve seen (so far!) on GMATPrep is a Data Sufficiency question. This doesn’t mean that they’ll never give us a Problem Solving weighted average problem, but it does seem to be the case that the test-writers are more concerned with whether we understand* how weighted averages work *than with whether we can actually do the calculations. Last week, we focused on understanding how weighted averages work via writing some equations. We’ll try to apply that understanding to our harder problem this week, along with a more efficient solution method.

Let’s start with a sample problem. Set your timer for 2 minutes. and GO!

* A contractor combined

xtons of gravel mixture that contained 10 percent gravel G, by weight, withytons of a mixture that contained 2 percent gravel G, by weight, to produceztons of a mixture that was 5 percent gravel G, by weight. What is the value ofx?(1)

y= 10(2)

z= 16

There are two kinds of gravel: 10% gravel and 2% gravel. These are our two sub-groups. When the two are combined (in some unknown “ for now! “ amounts), we get a 3^{rd} kind:5% gravel. The number of tons of 10% gravel (x) and the number of tons of 2% gravel (y) will add up to the number of tons of 5% gravel (z), or *x* + *y* = *z*. We need to find the number of tons of 10% gravel used in the mixture.

The problem this week throws in a new wrinkle: we’re not just trying to calculate a ratio this time. We have to have enough info to calculate the actual amount of 10% gravel used. Last week, we never had to worry about the actual number of employees. We’ll have to keep that in mind to see how things might change.

This problem never mentions the word average. That’s annoying. “ how are we supposed to tell that this is a weighted average problem? Basically, the problem should talk about 2 sub-groups that are combined in some way to make a 3^{rd} overall group, or mixture of the original 2 sub-groups. The problem will often discuss these groups in terms of percentages (as this problem does) or ratios (as last week’s problem did). That starts to tell us that *some* kind of averaging is happening.

Next, we know that we’ll either have an unweighted (normal) average or a weighted average, so check to see whether this is a normal average. We start with 10% gravel and 2% gravel. If we mixed exactly equal amounts of each (a normal average), what would the resulting mixture be?

(10+2)/2 = 6

Does the problem say we end up with 6% gravel? No. The amount of 10% gravel is *not* equal to the amount of 2% gravel. Therefore, this is not a normal average; now we know we have a weighted average problem.

Let’s go back to our test of 10% and 2% as an unweighted average. Instead of calculating with a formula (as we did up above and last week), let’s draw it out visually. Draw a straight, horizontal line on a piece of paper. Label the left end 2 and the right end 10 to represent our two different sub-groups of gravel:

2————————–10

An average of any two numbers will always appear between those two numbers. If the average is unweighted (50% of each is used), then the average will be exactly halfway between the two:

2————**6**————10

If the average is weighted, then it will NOT appear exactly halfway between. It will appear closer to one end or the other, depending upon the weighting. For example, if we have all 2% gravel and zero 10% gravel, what’s the average? A 100% weighting of 2% gravel will give us an average of 2.

**2**————————–10

In this problem, they tell us that the average of the mixture is 5, so the average is closer to the 2 end of the line than to the 10 end of the line. (Imagine a tug-of-war between 2 and 10.) Now we know that there’s more 2% gravel in the mixture than 10% gravel because the 2 end of the line has pulled the average closer to its end.

2———**5**—————10

To find the weighting: calculate the difference between the two ends of the line. in this case, the difference is 10 “ 2 = 8. Determine how far the dominant end (2, in this case) has pulled the average: calculate how far away the weighted average appears from the other end of the line. In this case, the weighted average 5 is 5 units away from the 10 sub-group.

The dominant end (2) therefore has the weighting 5/8, because it has pulled the weighted average 5/8 of the way towards its end of the line.

The non-dominant end (10) is just the remaining amount of the adds up to 1 figure (from our article last week): 3/8. The non-dominant end (10) has pulled the weighted average only 3/8 of the way toward its end of the line.

Now we know that, of the total mixture, 5/8 of it will be 2% gravel and 3/8 of it will be 10% gravel.

Conceptually, we want to realize that if a problem tells us the two starting points (the ends of the line) and the weighted average (the middle number), then we know we will be able to calculate the relative weightings of the two sub-groups. (This is the exact same concept that we learned on last week’s problem!)

Let’s examine the statements to see whether this knowledge might be useful.

Statement 1 says *y* = 10, which tells us that there are 10 tons of the 2% gravel. If I know I have 10 tons of the 2% gravel, and I also know that 5/8 of all of the gravel will be this 2% gravel, then can I calculate *x*, the amount of 10% gravel? Yes! 10 tons = 5/8 of the total. Divide each side by 5: 2 tons = 1/8 of the total. Multiply by 3: 6 tons = 3/8 of the total. (I don’t actually need to do this calculation on this problem because this is Data Sufficiency, but I would if I saw this on Problem Solving.) Statement 1 is sufficient; eliminate choices B, C, and E.

Statement 2 says *z* = 16, which tells us that there are 16 tons of the 5% gravel. I also know that z represents the sum of *x* and *y*, or 8/8. If I know that 16 is 100%, or 8/8, of the amount, then I can also calculate *x*: 16 tons = 8/8 of the total. Divide by 8: 2 tons= 1/8 of the total. (Is this starting to look familiar?) Multiply by 3: 6 tons = 3/8 of the total. Statement 2 is also sufficient.

The correct answer is D.

We can simplify this further (for future data sufficiency questions) by saying: if we’re told the two ends of the line for calculating the average, as well as the overall weighted average, then we can calculate the relative weightings, or ratio, of the sub-groups (just as we did last week). If we’re *also *given one of the three actual amounts, then we can calculate all of the actual amounts in the problem. In this case, if we’d realized that before examining the statements, we could have asked ourselves, Does the statement give me one of the three real amounts? and quickly recognized that each statement is sufficient by itself.

## Key Takeaways for Data Sufficiency Weighted Average Problems:

(1) Determine that you have a weighted average problem: this occurs when an average is described (even if the word average is not in the problem!), but that average is not a standard 1:1 or equally weighted average.

(2) Carefully write down what you were asked to solve, then determine what you know, what you don’t know, and what you would need to know in order to solve (before you look at the statements).

(3) Check the given statements to see whether you can find a match (that is, a statement tells you what you had already decided you would need to know in order to solve).

* GMATPrep® questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.

Thank you Stacey! very useful article indeed.

GEhLIx Adipex

It only goes to show where theres will theres a way. Keep on trying. – Dont count the days, make the days count. – Muhammad Ali

Do you mind if I quote a couple of your articles as long as I provide credit and sources back to your weblog? My website is in the exact same area of interest as yours and my users would definitely benefit from some of the information you provide here. Please let me know if this alright with you. Thanks!

Hi. I wanted to thank you for the excellent facts youve posted on your internet site. I will definitelycome back to check it out once again and have subscribedto your RSS feed. Have a fantastic day.

Hi,

Can you help with similar problems with more than 2 mixtures.

I cant believe your information contribution would be so mind blowing and epistemlogically significant nevertheless I will check out your other blogs and contributions thank you very much and have a stupendous day!

fuivku ncirdchange container reveling attaching indicators measurement wiley corporate mortgage sheetmetal